The “New York Convention” Advantage: Why Awards Pay Out Faster Than Judgments

If you hold a court judgment from London, enforcing it in Egypt is a gamble on "reciprocity." If you hold an Arbitral Award from London, enforcing it in Egypt is a treaty obligation. Egypt is a signatory to the 1958 New York Convention (Presidential Decree No. 171 of 1959). This means Egyptian courts are legally [...]

By |2026-01-24T19:17:09+01:00January 14th, 2026|Arbitration & ADR|0 Comments

Commercial litigation in Egypt: A General Counsel’s Guide to the economic courts & Enforcement (2026)

If you ask a standard lawyer about litigation in Egypt, they will quote the Civil Code. If you ask a General Counsel who has actually managed a dispute here, they will talk about three things: "The Expert Office," "The Notification Loop," and the "Execution Problems." At Consortio Law Firm, we focus on Execution Reality. The [...]

By |2026-01-24T19:14:15+01:00January 12th, 2026|Litigation & Dispute Resolution|0 Comments

Debt Recovery in Egypt: How “Enforcement-First” Drafting Saved a Malaysian Supplier

Case Study: Malaysian Exporter vs. Egyptian Importer In cross-border trade, the most dangerous contract is the one that assumes everything will go well. A Malaysian supplier learned this lesson the hard way. Engaged in a commercial relationship with an Egyptian importer, they shipped goods based on a contract drafted for "cooperation," not "enforcement." When the [...]

By |2026-01-24T19:22:44+01:00January 7th, 2026|Case Studies, Commercial Litigation|0 Comments
Go to Top